GPT-5.6 vs Claude Fable 5

OpenAI's new frontier model against Anthropic's most capable released model — half the price, and a genuine split on the benchmarks both vendors have published.

At a glance: GPT-5.6 Sol lists at $5/$30 per 1M tokens with a 1,050,000-token context window; Claude Fable 5 lists at $10/$50 with a 1,000,000-token window — Sol is exactly half the price on both ends. On published benchmarks, OpenAI's own tally has Sol leading 5 categories (including Terminal-Bench and Agents' Last Exam) and Fable 5 leading 5 others (including SWE-bench Pro and GDPval-AA v2). Neither model dominates outright.

GPT-5.6 vs Claude Fable 5: side-by-side

 GPT-5.6 (Sol)Claude Fable 5
MakerOpenAIAnthropic
ReleasedPreview 26 Jun 2026 · GA 9 Jul 2026First 9 Jun 2026 · global again 1 Jul 2026 (export-control pause)
TierFlagshipMost capable released model (Mythos-class)
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (default and maximum)
Max output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
API price (per 1M)$5 / $30$10 / $50
Cached input$0.50 (90% off)Not itemized on Fable 5 page
AccessChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, Codex, APIClaude API, claude.ai, Claude Code, AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry
Safety postureUS government safety review before launch (lifted)US export-control pull, then reinstatement; bio/chem fallback to Opus 4.8 (<5% of sessions)
StandoutToken efficiency — 54% fewer output tokens on agentic coding per OpenAIState-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks per Anthropic

Price comparison

ModelInput (per 1M)Output (per 1M)
GPT-5.6 Sol$5.00$30.00
GPT-5.6 Terra$2.50$15.00
Claude Fable 5$10.00$50.00

Estimate your monthly API cost for GPT-5.6 vs Claude Fable 5 with the LLM API pricing calculator →

Published benchmark figures

Figures are each model's own published score as listed on its AI Model Hub page, cross-checked against OpenAI's GA benchmark tally comparing the two.

BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5Leader
Terminal-Bench 2.191.9%88.0%Sol
SWE-bench Pro64.6%80%Fable 5
Agents' Last Exam53.640.5Sol (+13.1)
GDPval-AA v2Trails (exact score not published)LeadsFable 5
Cybersecurity (ExploitGym)Leads — most capable model yet for long-horizon security tasksNot the leader on this suiteSol
FrontierMath, HealthBench Professional, AA Intelligence Index v4.1TrailsLeadsFable 5

What the table says

Key takeaway

If your workload leans on long-horizon agent tasks, terminal/coding-agent loops or security research, Sol's benchmark lead plus half the price makes it the easy pick. If your workload is software-engineering-heavy (SWE-bench-style multi-file work) or deep knowledge/scientific work, Fable 5's benchmark lead may justify the 2x premium. Run your own token volumes through the pricing calculator to see the monthly difference.

Full GPT-5.6 overview   Full Claude Fable 5 overview

Ad slot — AdSense in-article unit

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 or Claude Fable 5?

GPT-5.6 Sol — $5/$30 per 1M tokens versus $10/$50 for Claude Fable 5: exactly half the price on both input and output.

Which model wins on benchmarks?

It splits. Sol leads Terminal-Bench 2.1, Agents' Last Exam, BrowseComp, OSWorld and cybersecurity. Fable 5 leads SWE-bench Pro, GDPval-AA v2, FrontierMath, HealthBench Professional and the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 — 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5. Both cap output at 128,000 tokens.

Which model is newer?

GPT-5.6 — GA 9 July 2026. Claude Fable 5 first released 9 June 2026, was pulled under export controls, and returned globally 1 July 2026.

Related comparisons